Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 371 F.3d 625 - Erringer v. Thompson

Erringer v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis

371 F.3d 625 · 2004

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
September 2024
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2024

10 federal appellate · 3 district ·

110200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78N (§ 14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1395 (§ 1801 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395F (§ 1814 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395H (§ 1816 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395Y (§ 1862 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 5 U.S.C. § 553 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946)

Relies on Shalala v. Guernsey Memorial Hospital · American Hospital Ass'n v. Bowen · American Mining Congress v. Mine Safety & Health Administration · Ellison v. Robertson · United Technologies Corp. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) when, in the absence of the rule, there would not be an adequate legislative basis for enforcement action; (2) when the agency has explicitly invoked its general legislative authority; or (3) when the rule effectively amends a prior legislative rule.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “No rule, requirement, or other statement of policy ... that establishes or changes a substantive legal standard governing ... payment for services ... shall take effect unless it is promulgated by the Secretary by regulation ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Th[e] requirement is designed to give interested persons, through written submissions and oral presentations, an opportunity to participate in the rulemaking process.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.