371 F. Supp. 319 - Feeny v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 673A · 28 U.S.C. § 1361 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Orloff v. Willoughby · Winters v. United States · Winters v. United States · Pvt. E2 Donald Jack Anderson, Ng26382581 v. Melvin Laird · O'Mara v. Zebrowski
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Although failure of orientation and specific notice of the time limitation on excuses may not be prejudicial in light of the circumstances of this case, the failure of meaningful administrative appeal and the effect thereof upon the meaningfulness of this review, together with the inadequacy of the Army’s investigation concerning the reason for Feeny’s fifth absence, do amount to prejudicial error which has deprived Feeny of the fundamental protection afforded by the Due Process Clause.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.