Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 371 F. Supp. 2d 870 - Pidcock v. Ewing

371 F. Supp. 2d 870 - Pidcock v. Ewing’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
May 2006
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 2308

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Moore v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc. · 26 Mich. App. 602 - Cova v. Harley Davidson Motor Co. · Employers Insurance of Wausau v. Petroleum Specialties, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) Express warranties by the seller are created as follows: (a)An affirmation of fact or promise made by the seller to the buyer which relates to the goods and becomes part of the basis of the bargain creates an express warranty that the goods shall conform to the affirmation or promise. (b) A description of the goods which is made part of the basis of the bargain creates an express warranty that the goods shall conform to the description. (c) A sample or model which is made part of the basis of the bargain creates an express warranty that the whole of the goods shall conform to the sample or model.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 435 F. Supp. 2d 657 - Pidcock v. Ewing
  2. “LEGAL REMEDIES: ANY ACTION TO ENFORCE THIS EXPRESS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY SHALL NOT BE COMMENCED MORE THAN ONE (1) YEAR AFTER THE EXPIRATION OF THE WARRANTY. Some states do not allow the reduction in the statute of limitations, so the above may not apply to you. Richard Pidcock signed an acknowledgment of the Holiday Rambler warranty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 435 F. Supp. 2d 657 - Pidcock v. Ewing

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.