Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 371 N.J. Super. 274 - State v. Och

371 N.J. Super. 274 - State v. Och’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2011
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brown v. Garcia · Flagg v. Essex County Prosecutor · State v. McQuaid · State v. Bellamy · In re the Commitment of E.C.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “entry of an order of forfeiture is mandatory and automatic in all but one limited instance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[F]orfeiture of office is a harsh penalty[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.