Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 371 NW2D 353 - State v. Janssen

State v. Janssen’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
March 2022
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 2022 · most notably State v. Lykken (1992), State v. Anderson (1996)

25 state decisions

14019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Phipps · State v. Dace · State v. Wedemann · State v. Houghton · State v. Helm

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Absent a sentence which is so excessive in duration that it shocks the conscience of the court, it is well settled in South Dakota that a sentence within statutory limits is not reviewable on appeal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.