Parkey v. Parkey’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently October 2012
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Sango v. Sango · Donahoe v. Alcorn · Tinker v. Tinker · Udy v. Udy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In a divorce action, the court is under a statutory duty to provide for support of the minor children of the parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“wife cannot, by contract, relieve her husband of his duty to support their minor children.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bingham v. Bingham“duty of [the] court to provide for the support of ... minor children.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bingham v. Bingham
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.