State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Ohio v. Roberts · State v. Mitchell · State v. Dennis · State v. Hill
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Moreover, there are significant credibility problems with the fact witnesses.... All were involved with crack cocaine on the night in question and did not initially give informative statements to the authorities. Often, cooperation with police on this investigation came only after several witnesses had been jailed on other charges and were facing prison time themselves.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gracely“[S]tatements which are not based on firsthand information, such as where the declarant was not an actual witness to the event, are not admissible under the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Prather“[V]iolation of a defendant's Sixth Amendment right to confront the witness is not per se reversible error; instead, this Court must determine whether the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.