Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

371 S.C. 19

637 S.E.2d 309

In Re Pearman

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 3, 2006

Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 2006-11-03

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 2009

4 state decisions

Applies SC 16 § 16-15-90

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-11-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

¶2 Respondent has been charged with soliciting prostitution, in violation of S.C.Code Ann. § 16-15-90 (2003), and impersonating a law enforcement officer, in violation of S.C.Code Ann. 16-17-720 (2003). The Office of Disciplinary Counsel has filed *20 a petition asking the Court to place respondent on interim suspension, pursuant to Rule 17(a), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, because he has been charged with a serious crime.

¶3 , IT IS ORDERED that the petition is granted and respondent'is suspended, pursuant to Rule 17(a), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, from the practice of law in this State until further order of this Court.

¶4 IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Jean H. Toal, C.J.

¶5 FOR THE COURT

/371/sc/19 · .json · Public domain