Suber v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
63
cited by 63 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
59 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Hill v. Lockhart · Caprood v. State · Sheppard v. State · State v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“deficient performance prejudiced the [applicant] to the extent that 'there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Garren v. State · Ramirez v. State“In determining guilty plea issues, it is proper to consider the guilty plea transcript as well as evidence at the PCR hearing.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Garren v. State · Kolle v. State“There is a two-prong test for evaluating claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. First, a PCR applicant must show that his counsel's performance was deficient such that it falls below an objective standard of reasonableness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Garren v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.