Mire v. Ormet Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently May 2015
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 332 So. 2d 834 - TL James & Co., Inc. v. Montgomery · Daniel v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters · Menke v. Thompson · Wallace v. Board of Supervisors · Johnson v. Anderson-Dunham Concrete Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Taking the defendant’s exception to its ultimate end, this court would not have jurisdiction over the subject matter to even entertain suits where fraud or bad faith is alleged. Further, we are of the opinion that absent legislative Uauthority, it is against the public policy of this state for such contractual provisions to be so interpreted as to deny access to the courts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Jurisdiction is the legal power and authority of a court to hear and determine an action or proceeding involving the legal relations of the parties, and to grant the relief to which they are entitled.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“That of workmen, laborers and servants, for the payment of their wages.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.