Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 371 SO2D 123 - Parramore v. Parramore

Parramore v. Parramore’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 2002
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 2002

5 state decisions

201978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gulf Red Cedar Co. v. Crenshaw · Smith v. Owens · Lance v. Smith · Pratt v. Carns · 156 So. 2d 683 - Brown v. Hutch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Actual manual delivery and change of possession are not always required in order to constitute an effectual delivery. The intention of the grantor is the determining factor.... In the well-considered case of Gulf Red Cedar Co. v. Cranshaw, 169 Ala. 606 , 53 So. 812 , the following propositions are announced: No formality or particular words or acts are essential to the delivery of a deed; delivery being a matter of intention, which may be manifested by acts and declarations, and may consist of a transfer of the conveyance without spoken words, or by spoken words without manual act.... The test of delivery of a conveyance is whether the grantor intended to reserve to himself the locus poenitentiae, and, if he did, there is no delivery; but if he parts with the control of the deed, or evinces an intention to do so, and to pass it to the grantee, though he may retain the custody or turn it over to another, or place it upon record, the delivery is complete.” [e.s.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.