Robert Burke v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
July 2017
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 412th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Montgomery v. State · Thompson v. State · Weatherred v. State · Gardner v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Notwithstanding Rules 404 and 405, Texas Rules of Evidence, evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts committed by the defendant against the child who is the victim of the alleged offense shall be admitted for its bearing on relevant matters, including: (1) the state of mind of the defendant and the child; and (2) the previous and subsequent relationship between the defendant and the child.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jesse Beam v. State“Whether evidence is admissible under Rule 403 is within the sound discretion of the trial court.” Burke v. State, 371 S.W.3d 252, 257 (Tex. App.— Houston [1st Dist.] 2011, pet. dism’d, untimely filed) (emphasis added); see also Tex. R. Evid. 403 (”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Buxton v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.