Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 372 A2D 1036 - State v. Bazinet

State v. Bazinet’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
6
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 2010

16 state decisions

8019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Union Carbide Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Gordon v. United States · State v. Wright · State v. Duguay · State v. Mann

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““To mandate a voir dire even when the information . . . is in fact plainly innocuous would waste time and insult the intelligence of court, counsel and jurors. Indeed, the unnecessary polling of jurors might give undue emphasis to unimportant matters.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““[t]he fair, efficient and intelligent administration of justice requires that a trial judge be empowered to make a threshold inquiry into whether potential prejudice exists.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.