Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

372 F.2d 93

Docket No. 21141.

Kilpatrick v. United States

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1967-02-09

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1970

3 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Sauer v. United States · Collins v. Markley · Smith v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1967-02-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; M. D. Crocker, Judge.

Franklin P. Jones, Fresno, Cal., for appellant.

Manuel L. Real, U. S. Atty., Robert L. Brosio, Asst. U. S. Atty., Chief Crim. Div., William J. Gargaro, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before BARNES and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges, and MUECKE, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

On the record before us, we decline to change the rule of this circuit, and affirm the judgment of the lower court on the basis of Sauer v. United States, 241 F.2d 640 (9th Cir. 1957), and Smith v. United States, 342 F.2d 725 (9th Cir. 1965).

¶2

We thank appointed counsel for the indigent defendant on an outstanding presentation of a difficult subject.

/372/f2d/93 · .json · Public domain