Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 372 F.3d 848 - United States v. Gillaum

United States v. Gillaum’s Empirical Analysis

372 F.3d 848 · 2004

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2024 · most notably United States v. Vallar (2011), Pole v. Randolph (2009)

31 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

350200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Kyles v. Whitley · Colorado v. Connelly · Michigan v. Mosley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Any conviction which has been expunged, or set aside or for which a person has been pardoned or has had civil rights restored shall not be considered a conviction for purposes of this chapter * * *.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The defendant’s age, education, intelligence level, and mental state; the length of the defendant’s detention; the nature of the interrogations; the inclusion of advice about constitutional rights; and the use of physical punishment, including deprivation of food or sleep. Narcotics, alcohol, and fatigue also may be considerations in a particular case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “If the state sends the felon a piece of paper implying that he is no longer “convicted” and that all civil rights have been restored, a reservation in a corner of the state’s penal code can not be the basis of a federal prosecution. A state must tell the felon point blank that weapons are not kosher.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.