Reutter ex rel. Reutter v. Barnhart’s Empirical Analysis
372 F.3d 946 · 2004
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Skidmore v. Swift & Co. · Auer v. Robbins · Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. Feeney · Washington State Department of Social & Health Services v. Guardianship Estate of Keffeler · Strongson v. Barnhart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Substantial evidence is less than a preponderance but is enough that a reasonable mind would find it adequate to support the decision.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“controlling unless plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation.” Auer v. Robbins, 519 U.S. 452, 461 , 117 S.Ct. 905 , 137 L.Ed.2d 79 (1997) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Reutter ex rel. Reutter v. Barnhart, 372 F.3d 946, 951 (8th Cir.2004). 2 . This provision does permit assignment”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the POMS are entitled to respect as publicly available operating instructions for processing Social Security claims,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Taylor v. Barnhart
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.