Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 372 FAPPX 246 - Baum v. Astrazeneca LP

Baum v. Astrazeneca LP’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Relies on Armbruster v. Unisys Corp. · Abramson v. William Paterson College · Anthony Nicini Jr v. Edward Morra · Reich v. John Alden Life Insurance · Shuman v. Penn Manor School District M D B

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Pennsylvania courts have looked to federal law regarding the Fair Labor Standards Act (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.