¶1 In August 1996, Robert Melancon, Louisiana prisoner # 371029, was convicted by jury verdict of aggravated rape of a male under the age of twelve and was sentenced to life imprisonment. He now appeals from the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 application.
¶2 Melancon argues that he did not receive a fair trial because adverse pretrial publicity saturated the community from which the jury was drawn, thereby raising the presumption that he suffered prejudice from jury bias. To the extent that he argues that he also did not receive a fair trial due to prosecutorial animus, that argument is not cognizable because it was not encompassed by the district court’s grant of a certificate of appealability. See Richardson v. Quarterman, 537 F.3d 466, 472 n. 2 (5th Cir.2008).
¶3 Melancon has failed to show that the state appellate court’s resolution of this issue warrants relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d). See Busby v. Dretke, 359 F.3d 708, 713 (5th Cir.2004). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.