Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

372 F. App'x 698

Padilla v. Holder

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided March 24, 2010

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2010-03-24

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Fernandez-Ruiz v. Gonzales · Ruiz-Vidal v. Gonzales · Minh Duc Luu-Le v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Decided 2010-03-24

¶1 MEMORANDUM

¶2 Jesus Armando Padilla, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of *699 the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Fernandez-Ruiz v. Gonzales, 468 F.3d 1159, 1163 (9th Cir.2006), and we deny the petition for review.

¶3 Padilla’s contention that his conviction for possession of drug paraphernalia in violation of Arizona Revised Statutes section 13-3415 is not a crime relating to a controlled substance under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(B)(i) is foreclosed. See Luu-Le v. INS, 224 F.3d 911, 916 (9th Cir.2000); see also Ruiz-Vidal v. Gonzales, 473 F.3d 1072, 1077 n. 5 (9th Cir.2007).

¶4 PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

¶5 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

/372/fappx/698 · .json · Public domain