¶2 Nathaniel Morris, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir.2004), and we affirm.
¶3 The district court properly granted summary judgment because Morris failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to whether defendant was deliberately indifferent to Morris’s alleged infection. See id. at 1057 (stating that a prison official acts with deliberate indifference only if he or she knows of and disregards an excessive risk to inmate health and safety); Franklin v. Or., State Welfare Div., 662 F.2d 1337, 1344 (9th Cir.1981) (“A difference of opinion between a prisoner-patient and prison medical authorities regarding treatment does not give rise to a § 1983 claim.”).
¶4 Morris’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.
¶5 AFFIRMED.