Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

372 F. App'x 766

Binford v. Benda

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided March 30, 2010

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2010-03-30

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Toguchi v. Soon Hwang Chung · Dodd v. Hood River County

Decided 2010-03-30

¶1 MEMORANDUM …

¶2 Bobby Laythen Binford, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that defendants violated his civil rights. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir.2004). We affirm the summary judgment for the reasons *767 stated in the magistrate judge’s report and recommendations entered on June 29, 2007, and adopted by the district court on July 27, 2007, 2007 WL 2193756.

¶3 We do not consider Binford’s claims that were not properly raised below. See Dodd v. Hood River County, 59 F.3d 852, 863 (9th Cir.1995).

¶4 Binford’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

¶5 AFFIRMED.

…

¶6 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

/372/fappx/766 · .json · Public domain