Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 372 FSUPP 1104 - Bauer v. Sielaff

Bauer v. Sielaff’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
January 2013
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently January 2013

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

10019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Pierson v. Ray · Johnson v. Avery · Eisenstadt v. Baker · Ex parte Hull

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We recognize that a prisoner has the constitutional right to have reasonable access to the courts. Ex parte Hull, 312 U.S. 546 , 61 S.Ct. 640 , 85 L. Ed. 1034 (1941); Johnson v. Avery, 393 U.S. 483 , 89 S.Ct. 747 , 21 L.Ed.2d 718 (1969). But access to the courts and not access to particular legal documents at specific times is the real issue. If a prisoner has reasonable access to legal counsel then he has the means to prepare, serve and file whatever documents are necessary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.