Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 372 F. Supp. 2d 185 - Lopes v. Barnhart

372 F. Supp. 2d 185 - Lopes v. Barnhart’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
June 2015
most recently cited

15 district ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Rodriguez v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Goodermote v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · 14 soc.sec.rep.ser. 301, unempl.ins.rep. Cch 16,883 Ernest S. Avery v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. The nature, location, onset, duration, frequency, radiation, and intensity of any pain; 2. Precipitating and aggravating factors (e.g., movement, activity, environmental conditions); 3. Type, dosage, effectiveness, and adverse side-effects of any pain medication; 4. Treatment, other than medication, for relief of pain; 5. Functional restrictions; and 6. The claimant’s daily activities.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “treating physician's opinion is generally afforded controlling weight if it is well-supported by medically acceptable clinical and laboratory diagnostic technigues and is not inconsistent with other substantial evidence in the case record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “ruled that no grounds existed for reversal when the hearing officer omitted one factor, but adeguately attended to the other relevant factors.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.