Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 372 NW2D 132 - State v. Devine

State v. Devine’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
January 2013
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently January 2013

9 state decisions

701985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Malloy v. Hogan · Patterson v. New York · Estelle v. Smith · Lisenba v. People of State of California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The procedure ... must effectuate the purpose of bifurcation by guarding against ... (1) prejudice to a defendant’s insanity defense arising from the evidence on the merits, and (2) prejudice to a defendant’s defense on the merits arising from the insanity evidence. If a bifurcated trial is not ordered, the jury must be clearly instructed that the incriminating statements may be considered only as to the issue of sanity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]t is fundamentally unfair to use defendant's incriminating admission to a psychiatrist during a psychiatric examination as part of the prosecution's case to establish his guilt”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he Fifth Amendment privilege bars the use of an incriminating statement made to a psychiatrist for the purpose of proving a defendant's guilt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.