State v. Tharp’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently March 2018
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 64 Cal. 2d 159 - Ballard v. Superior Court of San Diego County · State v. Romero · State v. Halstead · State v. Spargo · State v. Maestas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Remoteness in time of the prior acts ... is a factor to be considered, but not the only factor. If the evidence is highly probative, it may be admitted even though the acts were remote in time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Seevanhsa“to show a passion or propensity for illicit sexual relations with the particular person concerned in the crime on trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Seevanhsa“where families are torn apart, there is great pressure on the child to makes things right”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Schneider
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.