Graham v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 1963
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 78 Okla. Crim. 34 - Monzell v. State · 87 Okla. Crim. 423 - Application of Miller · Application of Cannon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There is no statute in this state which permits this court to issue an order requiring the district court to furnish a transcript of casemade after the time has expired for taking an appeal in a criminal case.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Qualls v. State · Shook v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.