Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 372 S.C. 1 - Wright v. Craft

Wright v. Craft’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

94
cited by 94 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

2 district · 78 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of Greenville · Elam v. South Carolina Department of Transportation · State v. Dunbar · Welch v. Epstein · Law v. South Carolina Department of Corrections

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 94 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(I) the defendant engaged in an unfair or deceptive act in the conduct of trade or commerce; (2) the unfair or deceptive act affected public interest; and (3) the plaintiff suffered monetary or property loss as a result of the defendant’s unfair or deceptive act(s).”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “In an action at law, on appeal of a case tried by a jury, the jurisdiction of the appellate court extends merely to the correction of errors of law, and a factual finding by the jury will not be disturbed unless a review of the record discloses there is no evidence which reasonably supports the jury's findings.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “An impact on the public interest may be shown if the acts or practices have the potential for repetition.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.