Davis v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
December 2014
most recently cited
28 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Glasscock v. Glasscock · State v. Gentry · Johnson v. Johnson · Woodall v. Woodall · E.D.M. v. T.A.M.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) duration of the marriage; (2) physical and emotional health of the parties; (3) educational background of the parties; (4) employment history and earning potential of the parties; (5) standard of living established during the marriage; (6) current and reasonably anticipated earnings of the parties; (7) current and reasonably anticipated expenses of the parties; (8) marital and nonmarital properties of the parties; (9) custody of children; (10) marital misconduct or fault; (11) tax consequences; and (12) prior support obligations; as well as (13) other factors the court considers relevant.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. King v. King · Way v. Way
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.