Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 372 So. 2d 1202 - State v. Cook

372 So. 2d 1202 - State v. Cook’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
1
states following
December 2006
most recently cited

45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently December 2006 · most notably 952 So. 2d 112 - State v. Price (2006), 896 So. 2d 1101 - State v. Corzo (2005)

45 state decisions

1901979198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 338 So. 2d 584 - State v. Crosby · State v. Green · State v. Lewis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “B. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to prohibit the defendant from entering a plea of guilty to a crime nonresponsive to the original indictment when such a plea is acceptable to the district attorney, and in such case, the district attorney shall not be required to file a new indictment to charge the crime to which the plea is offered.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The defendant, with the consent of the district attorney, may plead guilty of a lesser offense that is included in the offense charged in the indictment.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““In general, the lesser included offense must be of the same generic class and must not require proof of any element which is not found in the major crime charged.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.