State v. Hogan’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Infelice v. United States · 340 So. 2d 157 - State v. Jenkins · 365 So. 2d 1282 - State v. Barnes · 321 So. 2d 331 - State v. Sharp · 341 So. 2d 385 - State v. Mizell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If a person in any state, which by its laws has made provision for commanding persons within its borders to attend and testify in criminal prosecutions or grand jury investigations commenced or about to commence in this state, is a material witness in a prosecution pending in a court of record in this state, or in a grand jury investigation which has commenced or is about to commence, a judge of such court may issue a certificate under the seal of the court stating these facts and specifying the number of days the witness shall be required. This certificate shall be presented to a judge of a court of record in the county (parish) in which the witness is found.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hogan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.