Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 372 SO2D 270 - Moore v. Moore

Moore v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently January 2018

14 state decisions

7019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Taylor v. Taylor · Delevett v. Delevett · Guthrie v. Guthrie · Pearson v. Hatcher · 306 So. 2d 375 - Eaglin v. Eaglin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “First, the allowance was $75 per week for the family group and did not provide for an allowance of $15 per week for each child. Perhaps the judgment contemplated that a base amount would be required regardless of the number of children with an undetermined amount for each child being included in the $75 weekly allowance. Second, a child support order is not based solely on the needs of the minor children, but takes into account the ability of a parent to pay child support. Consequently, a child support order may not accurately reflect the amount actually required for the support of children, but may reflect only the amount a parent can afford to pay. Allowing an automatic reduction of an undivided order would ignore the realities of such a situation. Third, considering an undivided child support order as equally divisible among the children overlooks the possibility that the requirements of the individual children may very [sic] widely, depending on the circumstances of each child.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “... when a parent is ordered to pay a specified amount periodically for the benefit of more than one child, the emancipation of one child does not automatically reduce the liability of the parent for the full amount.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Otherwise, the responsibility of support would be reduced by the amount the party seeking to enforce the decree would be required to pay an attorney to enforce the decree.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.