Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 372 SO2D 304 - Michael v. Davis

Michael v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
March 1995
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. Persons · Ferris v. Montgomery Land & Improvement Co. · Hamby v. Hamby · Aniton v. Robinson · Street v. Watts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There is no tenancy in common and thus no sale for division where one is a tenant for life, while the others are reversioners or remaindermen of the whole. Street v. Watts, 202 Ala. 622 , 81 So. 564 (1919). This Court has approved sales for division where the widow joins with an heir or remainderman in seeking to have land sold to divide the proceeds among the owners of the fee after payment to the widow of her homestead and dower interest. Bedsole v. Bedsole, 272 Ala. 589 , 133 So.2d 237 (1961).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.