Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 372 SO2D 493 - Keyes Co. v. Shea

Keyes Co. v. Shea’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
May 2013
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently May 2013

15 state decisions

7019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 104 So. 2d 337 - 6551 Collins Avenue Corp. v. Millen · 98 So. 2d 510 - Lee County Oil Company v. Marshall · Luster v. Moore · Olson v. Brickles · 150 So. 2d 465 - Airtech Service, Inc. v. MacDonald Construction Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “cannot be adopted as the measure of damages where the cost of restoring the property would exceed the value thereof in its original condition, or the depreciation in the value thereof, or the actual damage sustained by plaintiff, or where restoration is impracticable.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “One of appellants’ primary defenses was that appellees had waived their claim against appellants by accepting the benefits of and performing the contract which they allege was induced by Chavez’ misrepresentations and breach of duty. That theory of the case has some support in the record and thus appellants were entitled to have the jury instructed thereon. Appellants’ requested instruction was denied by the trial court. If the jury found from the evidence that appellees paid the commission with full knowledge of the alleged wrongful acts of Chavez, it would be within their province to find that appel-lees had waived their claim regarding the commission and that they were not entitled to recover the commission.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “determine in dollars the total amount of losses which the greater weight of the evidence showed [the plaintiff] sustained as a result of the incident complained of.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.