Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 372 SO2D 892 - Jones v. State

Jones v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2000
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 37 Ala. App. 57 - Huddleston v. State · 36 Ala. App. 125 - Wyatt v. State · Gooch v. State · 31 Ala. App. 455 - Hall v. State · 348 So. 2d 876 - Finney v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"`"Forgery is not established by the bare fact that one man has signed the name of another to a writing having apparent legal significance because the signing (1) may have been authorized, in which case the writing is not false , or (2) though unauthorized may have been in the bona fide belief in the existence of such authority, in which case, although the writing is actually false, it was prepared without intent to defraud." Perkins[, Criminal Law 341,] 352 [(2d ed. 1969)].'"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “reasonable possibility that it may operate to cause injury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.