Fields v. Eazor Express, Inc.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Feb. 9, 1967.

Decided Feb. 16, 1967.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1967-02-16

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 1978

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Ketchum v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1967-02-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1J. Campbell Palmer, III, Charleston, W. Va. (Palmer & McCutcheon, Charleston, W. Va., on brief), for appellant.

¶2L. F. Poffenbarger and Martin C. Bowles, Charleston, W. Va. (Poffenbarger & Bowles, Charleston, W. Va., on brief), for appellee.

¶3Before BRYAN, WINTER and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Upon consideration of the record and the arguments of counsel, on brief and orally, the court observes no error in the trial, and the judgment now on review will not be disturbed.

¶6Affirmed.