Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 373 F.2d 602 - United States Rubber Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

United States Rubber Co. v. National Labor Relations Board’s Empirical Analysis

373 F.2d 602 · 1967

Citation profile

82
cited by 82 later decisions
2
states following
December 2006
most recently cited

76 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 82 later decisions — most recently December 2006 · most notably Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board (1970), National Labor Relations Board v. Golden Age Beverage Co. (1969)

76 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

38019671970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on American Federation of Labor v. National Labor Relations Board · Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. National Labor Relations Board · Fay v. Douds · National Labor Relations Board v. Joclin Manufacturing Co. · National Labor Relations Board v. O. K. Van Storage, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'specific evidence of specific events from or about specific people . . .'”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[I]t is not up to the Board staff to seek out evidence that would warrant setting aside the election.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “nebulous and declamatory assertions, wholly unspecified.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.