In re Special Proceedings’s Empirical Analysis
373 F.3d 37 · 2004
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 8 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1404
Relies on Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Branzburg v. Hayes · Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp. · Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia · Douglas Oil Company of California v. Petrol Stops Northwest
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Appointing a Prosecutor . The court must request that the contempt be prosecuted by an attorney for the government, unless the interest of justice requires the appointment of another attorney. If the government declines the request, the court must appoint another attorney to prosecute the contempt.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“not create or recognize any legally enforceable right in any person.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“a grand jury witness has no general right to transcripts of his testimony.” In re Bianchi, 542 F.2d 98 , 100 (1st Cir.1976). Similarly, a majority of circuits hold that a non-defendant witness seeking access to his own deposition transcript must make”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. In re Grand Jury
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.