Campbell v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
373 F.3d 834 · 2004
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Bell v. Wolfish · City of Los Angeles v. Lyons · Wilson v. Garcia · United States v. Robinson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that money never is an adequate remedy for a constitutional wrong.” But Campbell concerned a Fourth Amendment unreasonable-search claim — a claim properly characterized as”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[d]amages are a normal, and adequate, response to an improper search or seizure, which as a constitutional tort often is analogized to (other) personal-injury litigation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[u]nless the same events [were] likely to happen again to him there [was] no controversy between him and the City about the City's future handling of other arrests”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.