Basova v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 6 U.S.C. § 202 · 8 U.S.C. § 1153 (§ 203 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1154 (§ 204 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Shieh v. State Bar · Iddir v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Nelson v. County of Allegheny · Sepulveda v. Gonzales · Howell v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any motion to alter or amend a judgment shall be filed no later than 10 days after entry of the judgment.”). Local Rule 6.3, which does not require final court judgment, is applicable. 2 . In a footnote to the June 22 Memorandum and Opinion, this court noted that additional visas might be available from the group of 5,000 set aside pursuant to the Nicaraguan and Central American Relief Act (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.