State v. Ware

Decided August 22, 2002

Court of Appeals of Maryland · decided 2002-08-22

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“that, as to the belated appeal ordered by the Circuit Court on the single issue of whether Darris Ware had received ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, consideration of that appeal is deferred pending the new sentencing proceeding, and the belated appeal will be considered with the appeal, if any, from the decision in the sentencing hearing.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 170 Md. App. 1 - Ware v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-08-22

How this case has been cited

Cited by 83 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably Koshko v. Haining (2007), Blackwell v. Wyeth (2009)

82 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

¶2 The Court having considered the State’s application for leave to appeal from the grant of post conviction relief in a capital case, Darris Ware’s application for leave to appeal, and the answers filed thereto, in the above-entitled case, it is this 22nd day of August, 2002,

¶3 ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that both applications be, and they are hereby, DENIED, and it is further

¶4 ORDERED, that, as to the belated appeal ordered by the Circuit Court on the single issue of whether Darris Ware had received ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, consideration of that appeal is deferred pending the new sentencing *551 proceeding, and the belated appeal will be considered with the appeal, if any, from the decision in the sentencing hearing.