Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 373 NW2D 486 - Martin v. Heddinger

Martin v. Heddinger’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
8
states following
October 2011
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently October 2011

2 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

1001985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 69 Ill. 2d 534 - Nelson v. Araiza · Rosenau Ex Rel. Rosenau v. City of Estherville · Goetzman v. Wichern · Bohnsack v. Driftmier · Heveron v. Village of Belgrade

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a party who participates in the drinking activities during which the injuring party becomes intoxicated cannot recover under the dramshop act for injuries sustained as a result of such intoxication,” read in pertinent part:”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “quite narrowly confined and restricted by two or three elements or requirements: first, the plaintiff must know that the risk is present, and he must further understand its nature; and second, his choice to incur it must be free and voluntary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “conduct on the part of plaintiff, contributing as a legal cause to the harm he has suffered, which falls below the standard to which he is required to conform for his own protection.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.