Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 373 P2D 83 - Hill v. State

Hill v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 1967
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 78 Okla. Crim. 34 - Monzell v. State · 87 Okla. Crim. 423 - Application of Miller · Application of Cannon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““1. Title 22, O.S.A. § 1054, providing that an appeal in a felony case must be taken within six (6) 'months after judgment, is mandatory, and the Court of Criminal Appeals cannot entertain an appeal not perfected within such time. 2. An application for writ of mandamus requiring a District Court to furnish a casemade where judgment and sentence in a felony case was entered more than six (6) months prior to filing of such application will be denied. 3. Court of Criminal Appeals will not issue order directing that casemade or transcript be prepared at expense of county where the application for such casemade or transcript is filed after the expiration of the time in which an appeal may be taken.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.