Riddle v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently March 1987 · most notably Bruner v. State (1980), Schneider v. State (1975)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Sorrells v. United States · Sherman v. United States · 77 Cal. App. 2d 350 - People v. Benenato · 84 Okla. Crim. 309 - Finley v. State · Morales v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘Whether a defendant has been entrapped is to be determined by the jury, unless it can be decided as a question of law upon undisputed facts sufficient to to [sic] establish entrapment.’ ””
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“... (1) they are generally made by experienced police officers; (2) they are voluntary statements; (3) they are willfully jabbed rather than inadvertent; (4) they inject information indicating other crimes; (5) they are calculated to prejudice the defendant; and (6) they are prejudicial to the rights of the defendant on trial.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage““ * * * the planning of an offense by an officer, or someone acting under his direction, and his procurement by improper inducement of its commission by one who would not have perpetrated it, except for the trickery of the officer.” (See also Savage v. State, Okl.Cr., 304 P.2d 344 )”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Escobedo v. State · West v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.