Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 373 P.2d 85 - Williams v. State

Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
June 1976
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Tarter v. State · 72 Okla. Crim. 1 - Murphy v. State · 10 Okla. Crim. 314 - Payne v. State · 95 Okla. Crim. 119 - Clark v. State · 18 Okla. Crim. 1 - McNeill v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The rule is well settled that, ordinarily, a party may not complain of an error which he himself has invited, or which he has waived, either expressly or impliedly. This rule clearly applies to a case where one party resorts to incompetent evidence without objections, and where the opposite party relies with evidence of the same character. In such case, both are at fault and neither can complain in this court of the admission or exclusion of the evidence by the court below."”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““1. Errors to which no exceptions were taken will not be considered on appeal unless they are jurisdictional or fundamental in character. “2. It is not error alone that reverses judgments of conviction[s] of crime in this state, but error plus injury, and the burden is upon the plaintiff in error to establish to this court the fact that he was prejudiced in his substantial rights by the commission of error.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.