Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 373 So. 2d 650 - Perdue v. Mitchell

373 So. 2d 650 - Perdue v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
April 2016
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently April 2016 · most notably Selby v. Money (1981), Haddox v. First Alabama Bank of Montgomery (1984)

33 state decisions

24019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kilcrease v. Harris · Tullis v. Blue · Knowles v. Blue · Johnson Publishing Co. v. Davis · Dowdell v. Beasley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'It must be shown that the expected evidence will be material and competent; there must be the probability that the testimony can be obtained at a future date to which the cause may be continued or postponed; due diligence must have been exercised by the movant to secure the absent witness or evidence; the expected evidence must be credible and will probably affect the result of the trial; it must not be merely cumulative or in the nature of impeachment; and the motion for continuance must not be made merely for purposes of delay.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"To recover for damages for injuries sustained in an automobile accident against the driver's employer upon a theory of respondeat superior, it is incumbent upon plaintiff to prove that the collision occurred while the driver was within the scope of his employment, and happened while he was in the accomplishment of objectives within the line of his duties. Cook v. Fullbright , 349 So.2d 23 (Ala. 1977)."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “a mere gleam, glimmer, spark, the least particle, the smallest trace, or a scintilla in support of the theory of the complaint.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.