Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 373 SO2D 935 - Gillman v. State

Gillman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
2
states following
January 2014
most recently cited

39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently January 2014 · most notably 382 So. 2d 697 - State v. Bender (1980), 845 So. 2d 142 - Wilson v. State (2003)

39 state decisions

22019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sherbert v. Verner · United States v. Jackson · Scott v. United States · Baker v. United States · Otte v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The law is clear that any judicially imposed penalty which needlessly discourages assertion of the Fifth Amendment right not to plead guilty and deters the exercise of the Sixth Amendment right to demand a jury trial is patently unconstitutional. United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570 , 88 S.Ct. 1209 , 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968).”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “acknowledged your responsibility and . . . entered a guilty plea to the charges as opposed to requiring a jury to determine your guilt, because ... for whatever reason you continued to be unable to accept responsibility”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “by an individual possessing a valid permit issued by the Division of Health for this purpose.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.