McClelland v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
December 1979
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 86 Tex. Crim. 307 - Middleton v. State · Jones v. Baugh · White v. State · 158 Tex. Crim. 171 - Schwartz v. State · 135 Tex. Crim. 567 - Hill v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(1) When A. actually commits the offense, but B. is present, knowing the unlawful intent, and aids by acts or encourages by words. “(2) When A. actually commits the offense, but B. keeps watch, so as to prevent the interruption of A. “(3) When A. is actually executing the unlawful act, and B. engages in procuring aid, arms, or means of any kind to assist while A. executes said unlawful act. “(4) When A. actually commits the offense, but B., at the time of such commission, is endeavoring to secure the safety or concealment of A., or of A. and B. “(5) When A. employs an innocent agent, or by indirect means causes the injury, or brings about the commission of the offense. “(6) When A. advises or agrees to the commission of the offense, and is present when the same is committed, whether he aid or not.” Id., at 1052-1053.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Camp v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.