United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
204 federal appellate · 92 district · 54 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 1,199 later decisions (35 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2021 · most notably Consolo v. Federal Maritime Commission (1966), United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co. (1966)
204 federal appellate · 92 district · 54 state decisions — followed in 14 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1345 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1491 · 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 210 · 41 U.S.C. § 321 · 41 U.S.C. § 322 · 5 U.S.C. § 1004
Relies on Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · National Broadcasting Co. v. United States · Morgan v. United States · Willner v. Committee on Character and Fitness, Appellate Div. of Supreme Court of NY, First Judicial Dept.
Cited together with United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co. · United States v. Anthony Grace & Sons, Inc. · Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Camp v. Pitts · United States v. Wunderlich
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,199 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an administrative record is to be judged by a reviewing court.”
29 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““(b) This Disputes clause does not preclude consideration of questions of law in connection with decisions provided for in paragraph (a) above. Nothing in this contract, however, shall be construed as making final the decision of any administrative official, representative, or board on a question of law.” See also note 5 supra.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“* * * It would not be possible to justify the retention of the finality clauses in Government contracts unless the hearing procedures were conducted in such a way as to require each party to present openly its side of the controversy and afford an opportunity of rebuttal.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.