State v. Patrick K. Kozel’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
December 2020
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Mapp v. Ohio · Schmerber v. State of California · State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County · Cupp v. Murphy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(2) (a) It is unlawful for any person to cause injury to another person by the operation of a vehicle while: 1. Under the influence of an intoxicant, a controlled substance, a controlled substance analog or any combination of an intoxicant, a controlled substance and a controlled substance analog, under the influence of any other drug to a degree which renders him or her incapable of safely driving, or under the combined influence of an intoxicant and any other drug to a degree which renders him or her incapable of safely driving.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Consent may be inferred from actions 7 "'[T]he taking of a blood sample . . . is a search' under the Fourth Amendment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“will not read into the statute a limitation the plain language does not evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.