Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 373 WIS2D 468 - State v. David W. Howes

State v. David W. Howes’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
2
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably The Honorable William M. Gabler, Sr. v. Crime Victims Rights Board (2017), State v. Lewis O. Floyd, Jr. (2017)

32 state decisions

16020172020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Penson v. Ohio · Brinegar v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “prior opinions have referred approvingly to the general concept of implied-consent laws that impose civil penalties and evidentiary consequences on motorists who refuse to comply.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “[t]he Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 11 of the Wisconsin Constitution protect the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “motorists cannot be deemed to have consented to submit to a blood test on pain of committing a criminal offense [for refusing to submit].”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.